|
Monday 20 February 2006 6:08:44 am
Hi Paul,
>This bit of the discussion is with the standard node tree setup.
>I think were all agreed that having one million objects sitting
>under a single node will not work. Spreading the object load
>to other nodes may help but i doubt it. Thanks for that, Paul, 'preciate the clarification.
>We would like to understand better what the impact is on the
>rest of the system. If, say, we had a million objects sitting in
>a folder which is never visited, and all lookups to objects are by
>using an explicit id, will the system perform well?
Ah, understood. That'll be valuable information and I'm looking
forward to it. It's absolutely pertinent to the site I'm now developing.
>eZ 3 isnt quite ready to decouple as you suggest.
>However, eZ 4 will be. eZ components have part of the
>framework necessary for this, so for Exponential 4 a variety
>of storage strategies may be implemented. Though im
>sure only the node tree will be available at first.
Oh?! That sounds very promising. Is there a delivery window yet
for eZ 4? I'll be starting a project about mid-summer that will require
some of the things I've mentioned in this thread. If possible I'd like to
plop an establised CMS mechanism "on top" to handle design and such,
rather than build everything from scratch. eZ of course would be first
choice if it had the capability. But I'm worried about limiting the growth of
the product, just becuase I was after a quick and dirty first launch. Andy
|